Friday, October 23, 2026
HomeBlogJulio Foolio Autopsy: What the Medical Testimony Revealed

Julio Foolio Autopsy: What the Medical Testimony Revealed

Charles Andrew Jones II, known professionally as Julio Foolio, died from gunshot wounds after a June 23, 2024, shooting in Tampa, Florida. According to Court TV’s account of medical examiner Noah Reilly’s testimony, the Julio Foolio autopsy findings established gunshot wounds as the cause of death and homicide as the manner of death.

Jones was 26 and visiting Tampa to celebrate his birthday. Although online searches often focus on an alleged leaked report, the stronger evidence comes from medical testimony described during the 2026 murder trial. That distinction matters: reporting on testimony does not authenticate every document or photograph circulating under his name.

FactDetails
Professional nameJulio Foolio
Name used in police statementsCharles Jones
Age at death26
Date of deathJune 23, 2024
LocationTampa, Florida
Medical findings reported from trialGunshot wounds; manner of death classified as homicide

What the Julio Foolio Autopsy Findings Established

Court TV’s daily trial coverage identifies medical examiner Noah Reilly as a witness on April 30, 2026. Its account says Reilly described multiple gunshot wounds, including a fatal chest injury that caused rapid blood loss.

The same account reports that Reilly concluded Jones died from gunshot wounds and classified the death as a homicide. Those findings provide a documented answer to the central question behind searches for his autopsy: the medical evidence presented in court supported death from the shooting.

However, this article has not independently obtained the complete, signed autopsy report. The findings above come from courtroom reporting, rather than a page-by-page examination of the original medical document.

That limitation does not erase the testimony. It defines what can responsibly be attributed to it, without adding an exact wound count, toxicology results or other details that the reviewed evidence does not establish.

The Birthday Trip That Ended in a Shooting

News4JAX’s initial reporting placed Jones in Tampa for celebrations surrounding his 26th birthday. His attorney, Lewis Fusco, told the station that the group had been staying at an Airbnb and left after too many people gathered there.

Fusco described a subsequent attack in a hotel parking lot. Tampa police reported that three other people suffered injuries and received hospital treatment.

The first police statement quoted by News4JAX said investigators believed the person killed was Charles Jones, with formal identification awaiting confirmation from the medical examiner. Later official statements identified Jones as the victim without that qualification.

This change in wording reflects the difference between an initial notification and a later confirmed identification. Early reporting should therefore be read in its original context, rather than treated as evidence of an unresolved question about who died.

Hotel names also differ across the reviewed coverage. The initial attorney-based account named a Holiday Inn, while Court TV’s later trial coverage named Home2 Suites. A Tampa hotel parking lot is the consistent location description; the sources reviewed here do not resolve that naming difference.

How the Investigation Developed Beyond the Medical Evidence

On July 29, 2024, Tampa police announced three arrests and identified two additional wanted suspects. The department described the killing as a targeted attack connected to a Jacksonville gang rivalry.

Police alleged that the five suspects traveled from Jacksonville to Tampa to locate and kill Jones. That statement represented the investigators’ account at the arrest stage, rather than a verdict.

The distinction is especially relevant in an autopsy article. Medical findings address the injuries and death, while investigators and prosecutors must establish who participated in the attack and what each person did.

By May 2026, the case had progressed to jury verdicts. News4JAX reported on May 8 that Isaiah Chance, Sean Gathright, Rashad Murphy and Davion Murphy had been found guilty of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges.

Those verdicts should not be confused with the original announcement of arrests. Articles that still describe all four men only as wanted suspects or newly charged defendants omit major developments in the case.

Julio Foolio Autopsy
Julio Foolio Autopsy

The Sentences Reported in June 2026

FOX 13 Tampa Bay reported that a judge formally sentenced the four men to life in prison without parole on June 22, 2026. The sentencing followed the jury’s decision the previous month.

The same report said Alicia Andrews, the fifth defendant, had received a 15-year prison sentence following a manslaughter conviction for acting as a lookout. At the time of that June report, she was challenging her conviction and seeking a new trial.

These outcomes provide essential context without changing the medical findings. The autopsy evidence concerned Jones’s death; the verdicts and sentences concerned criminal responsibility for the attack.

They also explain why the date of an article matters. Reporting published immediately after the June 2024 shooting could accurately describe an investigation with no announced arrests, but it cannot serve as a complete account of the later prosecution.

A Report Request Is Different From an Online “Leak”

Hillsborough County’s Medical Examiner Department provides a formal process for requesting completed autopsy reports. Its published instructions ask for the deceased person’s name and date of death, and allow requests by mail or email.

That process gives readers a way to seek a document from its issuing office. It does not establish that a screenshot, copied passage or downloadable file found elsewhere is authentic.

The county says reports are usually available about 18 weeks after death. That is general administrative guidance, not confirmation of the completion date or release history of Jones’s particular report.

For this article, no complete copy was obtained directly from the medical examiner. Consequently, it would be inaccurate to describe an online file as the verified original or to claim that the full report has never been available to anyone.

The same caution applies to photographs. An image labeled “autopsy” cannot establish its own origin, date or connection to a medical examination, and this article does not authenticate any purported postmortem image.

The documented account is substantial without those additions: Jones died in a Tampa shooting, a medical examiner described the fatal injuries in court, and subsequent proceedings produced convictions and prison sentences. An accurate account of his death rests on that evidence, with the limits of the available medical documentation clearly stated.

MORE : Hunter Lee Soik: Biography, Anna Delvey & Where He Is Now

Most Popular